Skip to content

Cinemalphabet: G is for The Great Gatsby (1974)

April 7, 2011

Ever since hearing Baz Luhrmann plans to remake The Great Gatsy in 3-D I have been casually interested in revisiting the 70s 2D version. I can’t say this film is a fave or that I even like F. Scott much. I do know that the cast of this film: Redford, Farrow, Bruce Dern, Sam Waterston, Lois Chiles and great character actor Edward Herrmann is pretty fantastic (because they’re all so pretty and not necessarily because the acting’s pretty) and reason enough to consider giving this movie a spin. That said, the movie is okay, which means as a Francis Ford Coppola script, it’s a disappointment. But it’s worth considering as nothing more as a convenient way to see a lot of actors when they were young all at the same time.

The acting is the first thing that tends to elicit criticism from me. Mia Farrow and Bob got the bulk of the nastiness. Farrow’s harpy overacting provided an interesting contrast to Bob’s solid birch wooden acting. Bruce Dern and Lois Chiles are really the only actors who seem to be there in the moment. That’s the mediocre acting. Now the good acting is solely the domain of Sam Waterston who seems resigned to the fate of having this entire hot mess rest on his slouchy shoulders.

Roger Ebert is much kinder to the acting:

Oh, we’re told, to be sure: The sound track contains narration by Nick that is based pretty closely on his narration in the novel. But we don’t feel. We’ve been distanced by the movie’s overproduction. Even the actors seem somewhat cowed by the occasion; an exception is Bruce Dern, who just goes ahead and gives us a convincing Tom Buchanan. We don’t have to be told the ways in which Tom is indifferent to human feeling, because we can sense them. But we can’t penetrate the mystery of Gatsby. Nor, to be honest, can we quite understand what’s so special about Daisy Buchanan. Not as she’s played by Mia Farrow, all squeaks and narcissism and empty sophistication. In the novel, Gatsby never understands that he is too good for Daisy. In the movie, we never understand why he thought she was good enough for him. And that’s what’s missing.

Throughout the film it’s hard not to wonder if Coppola has actually read the novel on which his screenplay is based, as much of the script lacks the punch that fans of the novel (I’m not one) have come to love. Of course the physicality and trappings of affluence are on point; but that’s not a difficult element to translate to the screen. The emotional tone is off and while the novel and film adaptation isn’t exactly a black comedy, much of its failings make me laugh as though I was watching an episode of Soap.

It will be interesting to see how Luhrmann will overcome the clunkiness inherent in attempting to translate the distinctive prose while also trying to bring the narrative into the 21st century. The cast – Leo, Tobey and Carey Mulligan – already suggest things are not going to be improved much and things will be pretty much business as usual. As for this 3D business; perhaps it will prove a distracting element redirecting the audience’s attention away from the shortcomings of the film, the way a flapper’s swinging fringe dress can distract from her meager dancing skills.

5 Comments leave one →
  1. April 8, 2011 6:10 am

    Whatever the pros and cons of the Redford/Farrow version, Baz Luhrmann should not be allowed within a thousand miles of any remake.
    Seriously, let the TSA take him out to the back room and then throw him on the next plane home when they’re done. He’ll butcher a great book.

  2. hsofia permalink
    April 8, 2011 10:25 pm

    Oh my god, when I heard there was talk of a remake of The Great Gatsby with DiCaprio (whom I like), Maguire (also like), and Carey Mulligan (no opinion), my immediate thought was, “Wow, I can see that. Wow, that’s gonna be boring.”

    But now that I’m hearing Baz Luhrmann’s involved … – well, I don’t even KNOW what to think about that. I mean is there going to be singing and dancing? Surely. But do DiCaprio and Maguire and Mulligan sing? Well,who knows?! But I have to say, I enjoy Baz Luhrmann’s movies, not because I think they’re all that great; I just think his movies are fabulous. And even when it’s a hot mess, it feels like it’s HIS hot mess, which I really appreciate. He just goes pedal to the metal and I respect that no matter how ridiculous others might think his vision is, that’s what he puts out there. I also only bother to watch his films on the big screen because on my 26 inch television they come off as shrill and campy. I LOVED Moulin Rouge in the theater – I even bought the DVD – but was never able to get past the first 20 minutes at home. It seems like it takes a large movie theater screen to handle his tremendous sense of melodrama.

    So, all that being said. Now I think this remake will not be a snoozefest after all. It could be awful. But awful like, which is kind of amazing.

  3. April 10, 2011 3:48 am

    I’m watching it right now – for the first time. Snarky, I think you were pretty kind to say it’s okay. There’s an awful deadening weight on it as if everyone down to the best boy recited ‘We are working with a Classic here, and we must do it justice’ before shooting began every day.
    Very ponderous. Very European in its style, lots of Meaningful. Pauses. An hour shorter and it would have been a great film.
    As for the acting – the ‘butler’ who escorts Nick upstairs gets my nod. Most of the others were on Valium. Or maybe Serious Pills.

  4. April 10, 2011 3:58 am

    Oh, in this movie the girl tells the guy to put on the uniform. That’s something new!

  5. April 11, 2011 7:18 am

    William S Burroughs had a typically idiosyncratic view of the movie, and the translation per se of book to film.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: